Skip to content
Redmoon Calculators
Writing & editing

Headline Analyzer

Free blog title / headline analyzer. Scores your headline on length, word balance (common / uncommon / power / emotional), type (how-to / list / question), and gives specific suggestions.

Built and maintained by Paul Clark, Redmoon Software · Changes and corrections

When to use this

Use the headline analyzer before publishing any blog post, email subject, YouTube video, or news article. Headlines drive click-through; a 30% improvement in headline often beats a 30% improvement in body copy.

How it compares

A focused alternative to CoSchedule's gated headline analyzer. Open-source word lists, transparent scoring, no signup. Use it as a first-pass filter, then A/B test in production.

0 chars

How it works

The headline analyzer scores a single headline on three things: character length against an ideal range for the chosen platform, word balance (common, uncommon, power, emotional), and type (how-to, list, question, statement). Word count is shown but not scored, and readability is not part of the score.

Power and emotional word lists are drawn from public-domain marketing lexicons. Words that match neither power nor emotional are tagged as "common" (everyday) or "uncommon" (interesting / unfamiliar).

The composite score is heuristic, not a prediction. Use it as a first-pass filter, then A/B test in production.

FAQs

How is the score calculated?

A composite of length match, word balance (common / uncommon / power / emotional), and headline type (how-to, list, question, statement). Heuristic, not predictive.

What are power and emotional words?

Power words drive action and authority (proven, ultimate, revealed). Emotional words trigger feeling (afraid, breathtaking, devastating). Both improve click-through in tests.

Does platform really matter?

Yes. Email subjects work best at 30-60 chars; YouTube titles tolerate 40-70; blog posts target 50-70. The platform selector tunes the ideal range.

Worked example

Input

"7 Proven Ways to Boost Your Blog Traffic"

Output

Score 85/100 — strong. List headline with 2 power words, 0 emotional words, 40 chars (short for a blog title).

A leading number makes it a list headline, and two power words ("proven", "boost") put a quarter of the words in the power/emotional bucket. At 40 characters it falls short of the 50–70 blog range, so it misses the length bonus and gets an "add detail" suggestion.

Common pitfalls

  • Score is a heuristic, not a prediction — test the top 2-3 variants in production.
  • Word lists are English-only and skewed toward marketing language.
  • Highly emotional words ("amazing", "shocking") may improve clicks but hurt brand authority.
  • Platform matters — what works on YouTube fails on LinkedIn.

What the analysis weighs

The score combines length, word mix and structure. Length is the hard constraint, because a headline that truncates in search or in a feed loses its ending, and endings are where headlines usually put the payoff.

Word mix is the softer part: the balance of common words, uncommon words, emotional words and power words. That framework comes from headline-testing practice rather than from any published research, so treat the score as a structured checklist rather than a measurement.

The number is not the goal

Optimising a headline score is easy and frequently counterproductive. The vocabulary that scores well overlaps heavily with clickbait, and a headline that overpromises relative to the page costs more in trust and bounce rate than it gains in clicks.

The parts worth acting on are mechanical: is it going to truncate, does it front-load the meaningful words so it survives truncation, does it say what the page is actually about. Those improve outcomes reliably. The emotional-word ratio does not, on its own.

Read more about this

Related tools

Send feedback

We read every message. Tell us what could be better or what you love.